Articles

Featured Or Quoted In:

Published Bankruptcy/ Utility Articles:

Author

  • “Practice Pointers: Serving a Bankrupt Member”, Nat’l Rural Electric Coop. Ass’n, 45 Legal Rep. Serv. 3 (June 2009)
  • “New Section 366 of the Bankruptcy Code”, Nat’l Rural Electric Coop. Ass’n, 41 Legal Rep. Serv. 1 (July 2005)
  • “Electric Utilities Utilize Demand Side Management”, Legal Intelligencer 9 (March 16, 2005)
  • “Be Careful What You Ask For”, PA Law Weekly 8 (Jan. 19, 2004)
  • “First Day Utility Motions Suffer Procedural Deficiencies”, 19 Bankruptcy Strategist 4 (Jan. 2002)
  • “Responding To Section 366 Motions”, Nat’l Rural Electric Coop. Ass’n, 37 Legal Rep. Service 1 (Nov. 2001)
  • “Adversary Proceeding Needed To Stop Service Cutoff”, Legal Intelligencer 5 (Aug. 5, 2001)
  • “Commonwealth Court Upholds PUC”, Legal Intelligencer 7 (Jan. 9, 2001)
  • “PUC Waffles Over Tariffs Limiting Liability For Service Interruptions”, Legal Intelligencer 11 (June 7, 1999)
  • “2nd Circuit Allows N.Y. Utility To Recoup Pre-Petition Bills”, Legal Intelligencer 7 (Jan. 7, 1998)
  • “Owner Liable For Municipal Water Bill For Service to Tenant-Occupied Units”, Legal Intelligencer 7 (May 7, 1997)
  • “Court Decisions Conflict Over Who Pays To Repair Railroad Bridges”, Legal Intelligencer 9 (Dec. 4, 1996)
  • “Commonwealth Court Upholds PUC In ‘Most Favorable Rate’ Case”, Legal Intelligencer 5 (Aug. 22, 1996)
  • “Override Revenues Belong To Residential Customers”, Legal Intelligencer 7 (June 10, 1996)
  • “Court’s Discretionary Powers Limited”, Legal Intelligencer 9 (May 1, 1996)
  • “PUC’s Decision On LIHEAP Benefits Reversed”, Legal Intelligencer 9 (Jan. 19, 1996)
  • “Rooming House Tenants Have Utility Rights Too”, Legal Intelligencer 7 (Oct. 12, 1995)
  • “Rules Are Rules For Players, Umps Alike”, Legal Intelligencer 9 (Sept. 20, 1995)
  • “Court Disregards Privity Of Contract”, Legal Intelligencer 7 (Aug. 17, 1995)
  • “When A Contract Is Not A Contract”, Legal Intelligencer 9 (Jan. 18, 1995)
  • “Water, Sewer Utilities Come Under Scrutiny”, Legal Intelligencer 13 (Oct. 17, 1994)
  • “Court Scrutinizes Electric Utilities”, Legal Intelligencer 11 (Sept. 6, 1994)
  • “Water/Sewer Utilities as Candy Shoppes”, NY Rural Water Ass’n, Aquafacts 8 (Winter/1993-94)
  • “Are Bankruptcy Courts Observing State Laws?”, Credit World 35 (July/Aug. 1991)

Co-Author

  • PA Bar Institute, “Municipal Law Colloquium: Turning Municipal Claims Into Dollars” (1997 ed.)
  • LA Bar Ass’n, “Recent Developments In the Law: Bankruptcy Chapters” (1989 ed. & 1990 ed.)
  • PA Public Utility Commission, “Statutory Jurisdiction of PA Pubic Utility Commission” (March 1978)

Other

  • “New Section 366(c) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code: Panacea For Natural Gas Utilities Who Utilize Its Protections?”; presented on July 17, 2006 to Am. Gas Ass’n Legal Forum in Seattle, Washington